![]() ![]() MediaWiki is the most deployed wiki engine. Nobody ever got fired for picking MediaWiki Since MediaWiki is so well-known, a frequent question is: What is the difference between MediaWiki and Tiki? It is now used by several other projects of the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation and by many other wikis. This is a key part of the workflow on Wikisource.MediaWiki is a free software wiki package originally written for Wikipedia. Dokuwiki cannot read DJVU files and generate images and pages that can then be edited using the Proofread extension.Limitations of Dokuwiki compared with Mediawiki, what can Mediawiki do that Dokuwiki cannot: Important Dokuwiki URLs and Location Info All of these are hosted on AWS, either EC2 or Lightsail (preferably). As of now it is Nginx with Php 5.6, PHP-FPM and APC Cache. I used to use Apache and MPM Prefork with Opcache and Php 5.6. Some kind of Web server and some (recent) version of PHP. seo metadata (Title, Description, norobots, noindex).rename/rewrite/redirection on page name change.user accounts, including email alerts, password mgmt.There are quite a few functions/services that are needed for full-fledged sites, including the following: Note that I also intend to migrate off of a Mediawiki installation as well, but the multi-site blog replacement is as much of a pain point as the current Mediawiki is. A Dokuwiki-based wiki farm along with a third party ecommerce service (Gumroad) should make things simpler, easier to maintain and extend, and escape MySQL hell. That is, as of now, I intend to replace websites which have been maintained on a multisite WordPress (+ Woocommerce in some cases). My own emerging use case is something that I tried to do years ago with Mediawiki, but because of the nature of Mediawiki (impoverished community and technical incompetence), it ended in tears. Minimalist resource requirements that includes a flat file-only data store option (as standard).Community-friendly architecture for plugins and themes and.Ongoing, consistent, quality, incremental updates. ![]() That said, the main reasons for the ongoing success of Dokuwiki, I believe are threefold: The wiki as a communication tool has many competitors these days, especially in terms of enterprise and cloud-based groupware. That said, overall attention on wiki software as a category has declined over time, perhaps by half in the past 5 years for Dokuwiki (and much more for Mediawiki). Even with such a behemouth as a competitor, Dokuwiki has reached the point where it has more than half the generic searches in Google worldwide compared with Mediawiki. Since Mediawiki is pretty much a shit show when it comes to management and resource consumption, Dokuwiki is the winner by default. The only real competitor in terms of global mindshare is Mediawiki, and the only reason for that is of course Wikipedia and the other wiki properties run by the Wikimedia foundation. While there are many other wikis which are popular and in use (e.g., Xwiki, MoinMoin, TikiWiki, etc.), the competitors (other than Mediawiki) do not exceed half of Dokuwiki's popularity. By this I mean that Dokuwiki is the go-to wiki for most uses. Dokuwiki, over the last 10 years, has become the canonical wiki.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |